A recent public debate revealed deep divisions over the philosophy of transhumanism, questioning whether overcoming aging and death through technology will ensure humanity’s survival or lead to its destruction. Transhumanism advocates the use of advanced technologies such as genetic engineering, artificial intelligence, and bionic devices to enhance human capabilities and extend life. Experts and philosophers participating in the discussion expressed varied views on the ethical, social, and philosophical complexities of transhumanism. Some described it as an essential step for human progress, potentially eliminating diseases and elevating humanity to new heights. Others warned against it as a “sect of death,” cautioning that it could severely harm human nature and social balance, ultimately erasing true human identity. Emerging alongside rapidly advancing technologies, transhumanism involves efforts to augment the human body and mind through genetic engineering, neuroscience, and AI. Proponents believe that breaking the limits of lifespan will enable a new form of existence, while critics emphasize risks such as social injustice, ethical dilemmas, and potentially dangerous consequences. Experts agree that alongside promoting transhumanism, there must be thorough consideration of its risks and ethical implications, accompanied by regulation to ensure technology serves humanity rather than threatens it. Further research and public discourse are expected to guide a balanced and responsible approach to this evolving field.
Source: decrypt
